Other Arts:
Film
Flicks: Poetic Sacrilege?
by TimScannell
Now, it might be heresy
to state that I am poetically inspired by flicks, but I am. Of course,
taking a deep breath, thinking quietly a moment, and concentrating on motion
pictures produced after the mid-Sixties, we agree that film is the
most fraudulent of the arts; in fact, is not an 'art' at all. The camera
lens is our voluntary 2-hour prison, inasmuch as we see only what it points
to, whereas words are fusionable atoms which bounce, slide and carom, exploding
in a million very personal facets of (shall I say it, April- cruel?) mixed
memory and desire.
Light, angle, texture,
distance, every iota in film's milieu is controlled by a tyrannical director,
whereas a poem's words are ever pristinely birthed out of a new persona
and modulated voice (in each poem). Yet those same words, to come alive,
simultaneously demand an actively participating reader -- one individual,
private word-horde then, interinanimating with one other -- and a unique
experience with the history and allusion and irony of Western Civilization,
from The Iliad to this morning's headline on Kosovo.
I do, of course, include
as 'art' fiction and nonfiction which are, respectively, 'slowpoke' and
'rhetorical' verse. Conversely, the flick wants your eyeballs -- period!
Each still -- frozen-frame -- skips across the surface of a real mind
like a flat stone ripplin' 'cross a pond: There is no lexical 'verge,'
no cognitive 'deep forest' as there is when words and lines combine to
make poem qua poem (inner), and reader (outer) interact. Admit it, there
just isn't.
One might conclude
that I hate film. I love it, and have since the age of 8, happily allowing
myself to be a slave to its illusion of motion (discrete, still
frames remember), its illusion of participation (spectator-ticket/consumer-popcorn),
and its illusion of reality. No? Come, come now, think a moment! What could
be more unreal, ersatz and illusory than Citizen
Kane, Frankstein or The Sound of Music?
Yet here and now, older
and wiser to the guile of this mechanical 'art,' a little more cognizant
of the 'buttons' (need/desire) within myself, even a bit more mature than
at nine or ten years of age, when I traveled on the electric Aurora &
Elgin between Glen Ellyn, Lombard and Wheaton, Illinois to see movies --
thanks to wonderfully permissive parents. I adore flicks. Here's how they
help me poetically:
Visual epiphany:
a single-frame as the
essence, nature
and meaning of a whole film.
When Shane rides
into town to Grafton's at sunset, Hollywood orchestra booming, special-effect
lens gathering lower-registered Teton-ic clouds, the gunfighter's deer-skin-coated
right arm to the fore, passing by twin saplings (freshly planted by prop
men), Mr. and Mrs. Starrett know, little Joey knows -- hell, even I
know -- that the Hand of God is moving to bring Justice, to destroy Evil.
Our civilization's literature floods through me: Ulysses at Ithaca, and
Beowulf at Grendel's mother's underwater cavern -- then, twenty years later,
dying in a smoldering heap at the slain dragon's lair. Or think of Rolvaag's
Giants in the Earth: Per Hansa, lost all winter, found frozen in
Spring among the sere shocks of last Autumn's harvest, but the man is facing
West!
When Terry Malloy,
covered in blood (chocolate syrup), rolls upon gangster-beaten, pummeled
body (dead in any real world) onto his knees, then up, up, tediously
up ("Slower," shouts the director, "Slower. Savor it, Marlon!") onto initially
wobbly baby feet -- Ya gotta crawl before ya walk! -- the Contender stands
at long last as Champion in On the Waterfront. Our civilization's
poetry floods through me once again when the spaceman in Clarke's Science
Fiction novel touches the monolith: MAN HAS COME THIS FAR; H.G. Wells's
time traveler takes his invention too far forward, past a dying earth and
sun, into a future loneliness so aching and remote that even imagination
yearns for its return to the once-scorned present -- to the hearth and
home of its own 19th Century day!
When Charlie Alnutt
and Rosie, having consummated their love, having pushed the ol' African
Queen (C.S. Forester) into the ever-shallower tendril and muck of the
estuary of that heartofdarkness [Edenic] river, both of them exhausted,
bleeding hands, leech-welts to the armpits, in extremis prayer intoned
. . . Oh my, gee whiz! Here comes the well-earned Noah-downpour on the
upper reaches of the stream, cascading, whole trees and all, a miraculously-rising
water level down, down, downstream to their stranded little craft...and
lifting, rising, lifting, floating ("Gawd, John Huston, I understood
the epiphany at the very first raindrop that fell on Rosie's brave,
sweet palm!") its aging hull into the lake.
Our civilization's
poetry floods through me yet again with the first lines of Billy Shakespeare's
The Life of King Henry, The Fifth, as the Chorus calls out, "O for
a Muse of fire, that would ascend/The brightest heaven of invention," that
Henry might find the courageous persona/tone/voice to lead a fractious,
intrigue-beladen English army against the far more powerful French -- and
damned if he doesn't!
I've already discoursed
elsewhere in this mag on the persona of Bobby Frost's "The Most of It,"
who cries out to the universe for something more in return than its own,
mocking "copy speech"…receiving a stag "crashing" off the "talus" cliff
and swimming across the lake, water "pouring like a waterfall" off its
hefted body's triumphant shore landing, its forcing "the underbrush - and
that was all." [See Archive, Mar 2001, Essays. Ed.]
Yes, a flood, in response
to the thousands and thousands of works of our civilization's literature
I have read: V.S. Naipaul (23 nonfiction as well as fiction books); The
Neverending Story (Boy, what a poetic novel for young & old!);
The Yearling and Where the Red Fern Grows (animal companion/lonely
boy novels); Mr. Flood's Party (ol' town drunk) and Parting,
Without A Sequel (silly girl). Come on, folks, the work of words
is always better than the movie:
AND I ONLY AM ESCAPED
ALONE TO TELL THEE.
So, yes, I do love
flicks, but really now, they are saltine crackers which forever
crumble before the eight-course Lucullan feast of poetry, of novel, of
treatise, of words: 26 letters and a score of diacritical marks
which we artisans fret and labor over, revise again, again, and again --
even if only one day, mayhap, to reach those grubby hands of Hollywood
SpecFx, and those scheming minds of propagandizing, agenda-riddled directors.
Whatever you do -- sure, go see the truncated visual tinsel -- but read
the book and poem for yourself!
(Tim Scannell writes often for
Big City Lit (tm). He lives in Washington State.)